museum, never quietly swept it under the rug. The cardinal of Turin said it was no longer correct to call the Shroud a relic, but he didnât order the cloth removed from the cathedral. It took John Paul a decade after the radiocarbon tests to visit it again. When he came, though, he called the Shroud a gift from God and urged scientists to keep studying it. This had been the Shroudâs place in our heartsâin my heartâever since. We had no answer for the radiocarbon tests. But we believed we hadnât heard the last word, and until that word came, we would not abandon the defenseless. We would not forsake the forsaken man.
My inner turmoil increased when I saw that Peter was paying attention now as well. Iâd never spoken to him about the Shroud. The complexity of my feelings about it wouldâve been unfair to heap on a child.
âThe first thing you must know,â Nogara said, âis how the Shroud covered Jesusâ body. It wasnât draped on top of him like a sheet. It was laid under him, then back over him, in a band. Thatâs why we have a front image and a back image.â
He pointed to gourd-shaped holes cut into the cloth. All of them were in a pattern that matched the folds in the linen. âBut the marks I want to focus on are these. The burn marks.â
âWho burned it?â Peter asked.
âA fire broke out,â Ugo said. âIn 1532, the Shroud was being kept in a reliquary made of silver. The fire melted part of it. A drop of molten silver landed on the Shroud, burning through every layer of the folded cloth. The damaged linen had to be repaired by Poor Clare nuns. Which brings me to my point.â
Nogara plucked a trade journal from a bookshelf and handed it to me. The cover said Thermochimica Acta .
âThis coming January,â he continued, âan American chemist from the national laboratory at Los Alamos will publish an article in that scientific journal. A friend at the Pontifical Academy of Sciences sent me an early copy. See for yourself.â
I flipped through the pages. They might as well have been written in Chinese. âEnthalpies of Dilution of Glycine.â âThermal Studies of Polyesters Containing Silicon or Germanium in the Main Chain.â
âSkip to the end,â Nogara said. âThe last article before the index.â
And there it was: âStudies on the Radiocarbon Sample from the Shroud of Turin.â
It contained pictures of what looked like worms on microscope slides, and charts I couldnât fathom. At the beginning of the text, though, in the abstract, were two sentences whose gist I understood:
Pyrolysis-mass-spectrometry results from the sample area coupled with microscopic and microchemical observations prove that the radiocarbon sample was not part of the original cloth of the Shroud of Turin. The radiocarbon date was thus not valid for determining the true age of the shroud.
âThe sample wasnât part of the Shroud?â I said. âHow is that possible?â
Nogara sighed. âWe didnât realize how much work the Poor Clare nuns had done. We knew they had sewn patches over the holes. We didnât knowâbecause we couldnât seeâthat they had also woven threads into the Shroud to strengthen it. Only under a microscope could they be distinguished. So, inadvertently, we tested a fabric that mixed original linen with repair threads. This American chemist is the first to have discovered the mistake. One of his colleagues has told me that parts of the sample werenât even linen. The nuns made their repairs with cotton.â
A cool energy spread through the room. In Nogaraâs eyes was a controlled giddiness.
âAlli,â Simon whispered, âthis is it. This is finally it.â
I fingered the chemistry journal. âThe exhibit,â I said, âwill be about these scientific tests?â
Ugo allowed himself a smile. âThe tests are
Diana Quincy
Jean Plaidy
Kimberly Stedronsky
J A Howell
Amelia Grey
Angel C. Ernst
Judy Gelman, Vicki Levy Krupp
Elen Sentier
T. Jefferson Parker
Beverly Tobocman